-
Website
http://blog.tr.im/ -
Original page
http://blog.tr.im/post/160697842 -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Matt
5 comments · 1 points
-
json
3 comments · 1 points
-
RatherBeBiking
22 comments · 2 points
-
spatical
3 comments · 1 points
-
playerx
15 comments · 8 points
-
-
Popular Threads
It's easy enough. Please let us take part. (Make mine a vote for Paypal or another that doesn't require an account to use.)
You don't have to be the biggest to be the best. You don't have to be the most supported. Tinyurl had it for a long time, and they don't anymore. There is no guarantee that bit.ly will be around forever in this capacity. Take heart, and keep up the good work.
I would donate, but because of the time that tr.im was down I would have to wait atleast the amount of time that the service was taken down to send in a donation. I would also probably use anonymous means of sending in said donation(s).
Which I think is a more than reasonable assessment of the situation.
The service was taken down on the 9th and back up what looks like the 11th
Hence I would wait atleast 48 hours to send in a donation after the mechanism for sending in that donation was made available to me.
All in all I do believe their where infact other motives in mind with this shutdown.
But I must give credit where credit is due. And respect for innovation can only be a good thing.
My thoughts and prayers are STILL with the developers and owners of the service even though they still have bitter
thoughts that go along with them.
To quote a famous historical event.
"~ God speed john glenn"
The URL itself is also far better than bit.ly, is.gd, etc (seriously, they hardly seem relevant).
You have removed days of unnecessary work for me, and I love that, for sure! :)
I'd be more than happy for a paid service, to ensure continuation and reliability.
Fantastic, I can now get back to work that'll make a difference, rather than needing to dig up my tr.im links.
Thank you again, so much.
Cheers, Thea
As a happy tr.im user, I'd be glad to pay for premium service. Make it easy for us to pay and I'm sure you will get quite a few recurring payments.
One idea: make tr.im more like ping.fm as a place to update and manage statuses, photos, locations, etc on not just Twitter, but FaceBook, Brightkite, etc, all in one handy spot. Add the ability to submit link directly to Digg, Reddit, etc, via tr.im (although it would have to be the full link and not just the tr.im version). Take the features of pic.im add them into tr.im directly. For example, ping.fm adds a /p/ in its URLs that contain photos. Do the same from tr.im with tr.im/p/ being a short link for photos, and perhaps /l/ for locations, /m/ for music, etc. Continue to expand on creating powerful API's so that developers can use tr.im's features in their applications. Create or encourage others to create powerful browser extentions for tr.im.
Also create a website where people can track the hottest links, etc, being shared via tr.im. (Give folks who use tr.im the option of whether or not they want their links, photos, etc, listed on this page.)
Once you do, bake tr.im and its features into Nambu and create a superior Twitter client people will pay for. Perhaps create an alliance with other Twitter client developers (such as Tweetie) to feature tr.im as the default URL shortening service.
Good luck. I'm a little bit wary of returning to tr.im given how you suddenly wanted to close it on us last week, but I'll switch back to it for now in order to support you.
You may disclaim that this post isn't whining, but it sounds like exactly that. You were late to the URL shortening business and you didn't make the right contacts at Twitter and you got left in the dust. Now you're crying over spilt milk because another company has inked a deal with one of your competitors.
Personally, I'd never thought much about your service until I'd heard it was going under. One character doesn't make all that much difference in my tweets because I'm a good editor and can cut my tweets until they fit.
In order of adoption/preference, I have used tinyurl, bit.ly, and Su.pr. I work for a very internet savvy company and url shortening plays a big part of my job and I've never considered switching to tr.im. Perhaps you should work on your user exposure and marketing instead of whining about how you weren't savvy enough to secure a deal with the service that you rely on.
That said, it would be awesome to have more external tools integrate tr.im. HootSuite is probably a lost cause (they built their own service, ow.ly. bah.), but CoTweet and iTweet.net and a hundred others just use Twitter's default because it's Twitter's default. With some outreach, you guys can totally make people realize how useful and simple your service really is.
Go to Twitter client developers (tweetdeck, tweetie, etc etc etc) and work with them in order to get THEM to interface with you (so whenever the client shortens a URL with tr.im, it's added to our tr.im account right away)
Maybe working with 3rd party developers instead of twitter itself may be the answer
Show them who's boss , seriously.
I use tr.im for so much more than just Twitter. Please, keep this service alive!!!
A couple of guys who joined fb from msft had this to say abt twitter - twitter is run by a bunch of nerds who really have no strategy or business vision.
If I was funding twitter, I'd be scared.
Good luck, and again, Thank You!
This is great news, but I'd like to see a pay plan and a firm commitment over years to your paid users.
Be the elite URL shortener.
Stats are for pay. Short URLs are for play.
My answer to this latest news? It's too late.
On-again, off-again is more than a chink in the armor of trust you created. Who's to know if this will happen again - next week or next year? How can I trust using your service again?
Instead of coming to your users and laying out your feelings about the situation, surveying the replies and then announcing your decision. You simply made a decision - as is your right - then you listened to pleas and complaints and decided not to end things.
You did not consider your customers first. Yet when they implore you to continue, despite all your reasons not to, they suddenly become the reason to keep moving.
"We simply did not expect the response to Sunday’s announcement that we received," is becoming a tired response to the question, "why didn't we ask our loyal customers first?"
Until you give me a solid reason to come back, I bid you good luck.
- Bone
That and stating that you would lose 99% of your customers in the choice to begin charging is also insulting. This is a continuation of the mentality you illustrated in how you handled this whole thing. How do you know you would lose all your users? Did you ask if your USERS would mind paying to defray costs? No. You decided to shut down because there was no money to keep the service alive. Again this is your right. But obviously you handled it wrong.
This enormous loss (99% is being overly dramatic especially without actually knowing) you speak of is ironically insulting to the product you created. To say so many would leave if they had to pay - without regard too how much they would have to pay - says that you have built nothing of value beyond free.
What you provided was a premium service. The 'free' was a trial period to make it valuable and demonstrate that value. Stats have value. Anyone can get a php code to roll their own url shortener.
There are many stories in business where the underdog came from behind and became the market leader. So don't say that twitter/bit.ly was stacked against you in the "URL Shortening Business". That is absurd. Build a superior product, demonstrate its value, build a following and go from there.
There are also many stories of companies doing the same thing you did this week. Acting without asking the most important people in your company - your users. Kraft is one: http://brainsonfire.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/...
It's not that Kraft started charging for their magazine, it's that they did not take the time to consult their most loyal customers.
In closing, I can't emphasize enough that just simply saying, "It was a one-time event, and will not reoccur in any way," after originally stating there was no reason to continue [no money] and with no explanation for how this could be and no plan to at least provide proof of its perpetuity does not engender the highest level of trust.
Give me a strong reason to believe it - payment with guarantee of service through payment, a way to export the url data, something - and I will.
I can't tell you how to run your company but I hope that you have learned something from this. USERS/CUSTOMERS are all that you have. Treat them like you know they are that important.
- Bone
Then have free accounts allowing users current links they have already created to remain free and give everyone an allotment of between 25-500 links per year.
If you want more pie you have to pay for it.
EDIT:
Like many others have said as well not only should their be a "tip jar".
I would also allow users to buy lifetime certificates.
Second: Another way to keep people using tr.im despite of nambu, is upgarding a SIMPLE Firefox addon, that is defunct since Firefox upgraded to 3.5 and your addon didn't. Not a great way to pay respect to your fans (see, I,m not using the word customers, as in the mac world most things work on a fan basis, and that should be respected, form both sides, or the mutual confidence is over).
rule #2 of running any business: If u're not getting as much business, there must be something wrong with u. Fix it.
You stopped service and didn't even try to give us access to our data. OUR data.
Why would we want to come back to that kind of treatment? Your profit is the statistics. Use those, at least from people who have far more trust in you now. I will wait and see your response to Gruber et al.
Like a lot of people, I shorten URLs *before* putting them in a tweet. I began using tr.im long before Twitter used bit.ly as the default, when TinyURL was really all that anyone had heard of and I was dissatisfied with the lack of information on my shortened URLs. I briefly used is.gd, but despite the shorter URLs I was still dissatisfied because once I shortened a URL, my involvement in its creation was lost to the ether.
Then I found tr.im, and I rejoiced. It was something like a site I'd used a couple times in the past - SnipURL (on seeing it used in PC Annoyances: Second Edition by PC World's former editor, Steve Bass) - but it offered much more data and (I thought) a much better interface.
So yes, a tip jar would be a very good step. PayPal, Google Checkout, tipjoy - whatever you can think of - add the button and you will get money. It (almost) never fails, especially for something as great as tr.im.
Other than that point (which I just wanted to reiterate), most of the other ideas in this thread are awesome, and I would seriously consider them.
And one more thing: Please no more scares like the one we just had. I was a little depressed all day yesterday because of your announcement. But I'm glad you're back!
Here is a tweet, where I trim'd a URL, and it's even longer than the current ID.
Hope you like the name.
http://tr.im/resurrected
Twitter didn't dork my trim'd URL to bit.ly
http://twitter.com/px/status/3253349978
There really just needs to be on/off switches for the application of URL shortening in these networks.
Anyways while still a shorter example of the title and URL, the tr.im'd URL length example is understandably a bit extreme.
No, they didn't. I *always* shorten my links before writing a tweet. I never "let Twitter do it for me." Most of the links I see on Twitter these days are Ow.ly anyway, not Bit.ly... You have plenty of users, so find a business model. Twitter hasn't stacked the deck against you. You have users, you can make money. Be innovative for crying out loud. Charge for premium accounts for power users or developers. (Add rate limiting to your API, with paid option for more hourly queries; offer more statistics and reporting for paying users, etc.) It's not rocket science.
Twitter isn't preventing you from succeeding, you are.
my idea about trimming text is like this: some one want to post something that it's longer than 140 chars, but it's not a blog post, then he goes to tr.im ( the brand name is perfect for this by the way ) then he login to his twitter account from tr.im website ( you need twitter api for this ) then he have a box to write a tweet, but wait he have a box that accept up to 600 letters for example, you may make it unlimited then he tweet this 600 letters, and tr.im take the first 130 letters and add a link in the end to the full story which is saved in this case at tr.im server so when some one clicks this link he goes to tr.im/adf32d or tr.im/username/WHATEVER for example and he see the full sotry
and you may expand this in the future so it include other micro-blogging services..
I think this is something new, and if you are php or python powered I can help on that just for fun !!
I wonder how are you facing the costly and non viable business problem now?
I was about to begin work on URL shortening service of my own in Trim's wake, simply because none of your competitors can do what I want them to. I cannot use bit.ly, or is.gd, or tinyurl because none of these can do what trim could, and would rather engineer my own than lower my standards.
Thank you, Trim. Good luck to you all.
i rely on the great combination of tr.im, pic.im and nambu on my iphone so thank you again for continuing.
wish you the best and hope to see even more innovation from you in the future.
Agreed
I like tr.im much better than other shorteners, and I personally would not mind encountering ads myself and feel it would be a small price to pay to keep tr.im around.
sull.tr.im = my stream.
tr.im/ruf7 = hash short url
tr.im/myslug = keyword short url
build that in response the the response you have received and build it by referring to rssCloud.org.
If you plan to develop Nambu further, please fix the direct message (sending) functionality - too many times, when sending direct, Nambu crashes. Even when it doesn't crash, there's no indication that the direct was sent successfully, if at all, without going to the "Sent" tab. At a minimum, the status should say "Direct sent successfully" and/or the "Sent" item should pop up an indicator indicating that a new message has been sent.
Another annoyance is that the recipient of a direct isn't shown in the "Sent" item - all that is shown, aside from the message, is me as the sender. This is less than helpful, as I know that I'm the one I sent the direct. What I need to know (or would like to see) is who I sent the direct to.
Do you think ,after your little drama from yesterday , people will still use your service ? what is the guarantee that you wont change your mind again ?
Kind of like the diggbar stays on pages visited through Digg, but then a narrow bar with a context-related ad. Should help making it profitable.
Do you want people who have provided you with ideas for re-thinking TR.IM to post publicly here in this blog?
I may as well do so, because otherwise it's lost. And if there is anyone else out there who in interested in followup to this, either with tr.im or independent of tr.im, please contact me: quicksite_AT_gmaildotcom
My view? Think video. Right around the corner.
twitter <---> text blogging
as
xxxxxxx <----> youtube
tr.im is an amazingly perfect brand name for the video equivalent of twitter... And if you step back from your current scenario, and just, for a moment, let all the chit chat of twitter fall away, picture this: the Mobile Phone industry has worked very hard to enable multimedia messaging vs plain text messaging. While it took 3 releases of the iPhone to get video, finally, Windows Mobile has had it for 4 years... 4 years of video from the cell phone, and sending video clip messaging.
So the leap is crystal clear.
If "twitter" is simply "broadcast texting" -- which is really what it is, vs the fancier sounding "micro-blogging"... then the next thing around the competitive corner will be Broadcast Video Messaging -- 5-to-10 second video "trims" (the name is already there), the 140 character "clipped" version of a YouTube video.
As clear as day, while law enforcement cracks down on texting in cars, and therefore twittering in cars, what we will see is video-ing in cars, and bluetooth sending up to that "twitter" site, only it will be called tr.im, not twitter.
Why "TRIM" as the perfect name?
The word "trim" is exactly what the film biz has always referred to motion picture edits that have been made, to tighten up a scene, or the inventory of short shots, usually facial reactions, that were cut, but maybe used for other purposes. In the world of broadcast instant-messaging, it would be the video equivalent of a tweet -- something you'd immediately upload to be broadcast widely (at tr.im), rather than shooting a 5-minute piece for youtube.
You have a remarkable opportiunity to "own" that space. And what will happen in that space?
CONSUMER FEEDBACK to all sorts of brands and advertising. Probably real-time opinions about TV shows like LOST. There will be new ads on TV that are actually games, where they ask people to predict what the next scene will be, etc. There are thousands of ways people will be expressing themselves in 5-10 second videos. And I can bet you a large sum of money that THAT is something you can bank on:
It's the very obvious next step of micro-broadcast-messages, real-time video clips of 5-to-10 seconds. You can also look at it as "broadcast skype", or "mini-U-stream".
Okay, there it is. I'm sure i will live to regret this next part, but: I laugh at twitter. It will become the black & white dot-matrix printer compared to what "microvideo" will be. Someone will be first-to-market and own that space,which will be a huge boon to advertisers and focus groups and political polling of opinions. Instant feedback.
quicksite_AT_gmaildotcom
Question still there:
Is Nambu being discontinuated, or not?
All time favourite Mac Twitter client.
Also as for tr.im: update Firefox extension to suit FF 3.5. An easy way to keep tr.im going
Still, as I see it right now, it is more like a micro version of uStream.tv ... where, they don't care what you do with that video.
I am betting that consumer market research and political polling will become the killer user base for the kind of service I am proposing. It's not always just the tech. It's how it's used :) But thanks very much. I think they've done a great job. Branding? ehhh, not great. if you were to, at this moment, slap the name tr.im on that offering, it would instantly increase its value proposition, at minimum by being more memorable, thus easier to disseminate the existence of it virally.
You guys better think before doing/announcing things
AHAHHAAHAHHAHAHA I LOL'D!!!!
The one thing I can't understand is: how much time did evan & co put into branding? I commented on it here (admittedly, rather harshly), but nonetheless, fyi... http://blog.tr.im/post/159489555/tr-im-to-decem...
you can go to www.ping.fm and see how many status update / micro-blogging services that exists out there, most of them don't have url shortening solutions..
I'm not sure what would be in it for the owners/developers of tr.im , but if there were a way to make it win-win, that would be a killer app, not unlike firefox.
by the way, I read your further ideas below. You have very good ideas, and can see past the current landscape, which is sort of a rare quality these days. kudos.
and thanks for your nice words :) it turned out that there is actually something like that, but still tr.im is a great name for trimming text :)
It happens everyday.
People really tech savvy, with good usability design as well, throw something against a wall to see if it sticks... or try a "better mousetrap". And lack business enterprise experience to plan & execute toward an end.
I think in this case, it's not a stunt, it's more like the line Robert DeNiro used in "Wag the Dog" : They didn't think it through... both times, at the start of the site, and before they pulled the plug without communicating with users.
Good luck.
As an unbiased general Internet user with no affiliations or affections for Twitter or anyone else I ask: who gives a rat's ass?
"The URL shortening business" -- what a hilarious proposition. I guess that's like the "windshield squeegeeing business".
People need only to step back and think about infrastructure and design in general to realise how thick-skulled it is to depend on any "URL shortening service" to begin with.
-b
Involve your community in the decisions before you make them, not afterwards.
I know of some innovative ways to monetize this service, If you're interested, respond to this comment [the notification goes straight to my phone]. Maybe we can help each other out. Thanks.
Good. I'm glad about that.
Keep up the good work!
Either way I'm glad to see that you're staying in business because of all the URL shortening services I preferred yours for many of the same reasons everyone else does. http://tr.im/1urlshortener
Glad to see your back and I will continue to use you.
P.S. If you have to announce closing your doors again please allow those of us that have invested time in using your service to get their information.
I've experimented some with Tr.im and would like to do more, so am glad to learn it will continue. You already have a nice feature set and it will be hard for anyone to come up with a better URL, which is important. Certainly there's considerable value there.
BTW, I never use Twitter's URL shortening, in my experience it's quite erratic and undependable! I always go to Tr.im to shorten URLs for my tweets. It isn't much of a burden since the stats were right there on the page so it was an easy way to keep track of them. The whole Twitter/Bit.ly vs. Tr.im thing is just a mirage, IMHO.
I would donate, but because of the time that tr.im was down I would have to wait atleast the amount of time that the service was taken down to send in a donation. I would also probably use anonymous means of sending in said donation(s).
Which I think is a more than reasonable assessment of the situation.
The service was taken down on the 9th and back up what looks like the 11th
Hence I would wait atleast 48 hours to send in a donation after the mechanism for sending in that donation was made available to me.
All in all I do believe their where infact other motives in mind with this shutdown.
But I must give credit where credit is due. And respect for innovation can only be a good thing.
My thoughts and prayers are STILL with the developers and owners of the service even though they still have bitter
thoughts that go along with them.
To quote a famous historical event.
"~ God speed john glenn"
Seriously, you guys should stop accepting new URL submissions immediately so no one makes fool out of themselves in next 6 months. Let the old URLs show ads in frame or whatever to keep the current servers going and fund your network cost for as long as possible. That would be your service to community who trusted you.
Here is my take on it: http://bit.ly/hf5pl
I only chose your service because of the "cooler" URL. Bit.ly has the right idea and I can trust that they've got more interest in their users than you do. Their most recent blog post illustrates this with their 301works project.... pointing out that you weren't interested in working with them, your "interest is in selling tr.im."
Good luck.
http://mavrev.com/site/story/why_no_one_should_...
. I keep monthly stats offline and switching to a new service means these stats don't have a common basis (robots vs real users) since other services slice and dice differently.
. I am hesitant to use tr.im without some sort of lag time as to when it would go away. (a month warning?) I ran around changing future publish links like mad a few days ago.
. Please consider putting advertising on the stats page. I think if you looked at your stats breakdown your core users are looking at your great statistics. This would defer some of your costs as well as not impact link users.
. While there are many examples of businesses that could not translate to direct pay on the web I think it would be higher than you think. For many of us we used tr.im as part of our business consider a nominal fee to get at stats with the account.
. Focusing on the end user (I'm a usability person) is a competitive edge coveted by few companies. Your elegant service gives you this, don't be so quick to throw it away.
. Lastly I wish you luck whichever way you go.
I've been using TinyURL for about 5 years, and now used tr.im since I found out about it earlier this year. I only opened my twitter account for a bit of a laugh and have posted maybe 3 links (using tr.im). I use url shortners in email Facebook status and other stuff.
So stop obsessing about Twitter. URL shortners (and hence potential monetization) are not limited to the 6m (0.005%) people on Twitter, they're limited to the 1.5bn (http://tr.im/wk5u) internet users.
trying to win over API developers. If you can get developers to use your service within their apps you
can still get a good chunk of the URL shortening on twitter. Also maybe check out partnering with other services
such as identica. I really like your service over bitly's.
You haven't changed your tune. You're still saying that Twitter is to blame for your failure - and it *is* a failure. You still can't see that you need to move beyond Twitter into other spaces. This is evident by what you posted as #1 above.
In #2, you say you'd rather close tr.im down than sell it to someone you don't know. Welcome to the real world - you aren't going to know everyone you do business with. If you can't handle it, sell it to someone who can.
Point #3, you say you have no interest in framing or interstitials. Great. You admit you have no interest in making money. There is NO other way to make a URL shortener profitable, unless you collect donations. Good luck with that. You might have a few hundred comments on the site here from "loyal" users, but when it comes down to dollars, you'll be lucky if a handful of them actually put their money where their mouth is.
Lastly, you say this wasn't a public relations stunt. Well, duh. Unless you're completely pea-brained, you must understand that putting your future at risk for a couple days' worth of minor press coverage would be pretty stupid.
You're probably going to lose quite a lot of people when they realize that you're not likely to survive the end of the year (and I'm sure you'll blame Twitter and bit.ly again). How do I know? Because you've lost *me*, and I know I'm not alone. I've used tr.im, and I've been using and promoting Nambu until recently. Now, I'll never use either again because I can't be sure that you won't pack it up next month and go crying to Mommy about how Twitter isn't playing fair.
Twitter doesn't define ANYTHING. If you don't wake up to that, there's no hope for tr.im or Nambu. You can suggest whatever you like, I already said I'm not using tr.im anymore. I've now said all I'm going to say about this. I'm not going to waste any more time trying to make someone who is so blind to reality see reason.
You're choosing to be a "Twitter developer", putting all your eggs in one VERY unprofitable basket. Get over Twitter. There are other uses for URL shorteners.
Now, seriously, if you can't at least acknowledge my statement, if you insist on crying about Twitter's supposed domination over URL shortening services (despite TinyURL's massive success before Twitter even existed), just don't respond at all. Please. I'm not the one ignoring basic realities (though I have no idea what book you think I'm referring to).
Man you are a self-important douche.
The first is to talk to twitter and tell them what they are may be considered anti competive behavor (think Microsoft search lawsuit)
AND
you may also see if any bigger websites would want to work with you guys (maby facebook? thier becon service looks like it could fit here)
I use andriod as my twitter client and an app called URL Shortener. Added you guys as man default shortening site.
Cheers
I use andriod as my twitter client and an app called URL Shortener. Added you guys as man default shortening site.
Cheers
Welcome back. Please dont' go again.
If a donation link pops up, I may use it after a little time has passed and it appears that the products are here to stay for a while. Absolutely, if nambu becomes shareware, I will pay for it.
However, until nambu makes their development future a bit clearer to their users, I will not feel comfortable recommending their products any longer as I have previously done in my twitter feed.
Mind you, I don't expect details on exactly what nambu has in mind, nor precisely why they make their decisions -- but reassuring broad statements like "we will announce a few ideas for monetization in September" or "we plan to release at least two more revisions of nambu before the end of the year" would bring the developers and their product users closer to each other and develop user confidence.
I look forward in hope to new developmens for both tr.im and nambu.
First, you make a whiny announcement about how there's no point continuing tr.im with no way to make money and no support from Twitter. Then, you announce that you'll be breaking millions of links at the end of the year by turning off the tr.im servers. Finally, you tell us it was all a joke.
That's what this is, anyway. A joke. An insult to your users. Do you get some sort of sadist thrill out of pulling these stunts? You obviously had no intention of ending tr.im. This was just a publicity stunt. A very bad one at that, because it alienates your users. How can anyone take you seriously again?
Until recently, Twitter favored TinyURL. Why weren't you squawking then? Twitter shows disfavor to you now no more than they did then. GET OVER IT. If you can't make tr.im popular without sponsorship from Twitter, then you don't deserve to succeed. Do you hear Steve Jobs constantly complaining about Microsoft?
You were "overwhelmed" by the response? 300 comments and a handful of emails overwhelmed you? You have a popular service. When you announce that you will be shutting it down and breaking all your links, how can you not expect an overwhelming response?
A service like tr.im should not cost more than $1000 a month to host. If you need money, don't pull this shit. Ask for donations. You would have gotten them. But now, you'll get nothing, because you've proven what rotten people you are.
This is good news. Sorry I was so nasty about your reversal before. Everyone makes mistakes, as I did.
I wrote a blog post called Egregious Failures, where I included the scathing comment I gave you, and cited it as an egregious failure on my part. If you read it, you'll realize I'm a hypocrite, because my URL shortening service Th8.us had a three day outage one month before. My service receives 1/1000 of the visitors that tr.im gets, but on principle my comment was wrong. Unlike my service, your service did not go offline at all. You just made an announcement which made people angry. TinyURL and Twitter have had major outages in the past few months. Your mistake was insignificant in comparison. If I did not read your blog or check your home page when you had the announcement up, I would not even know about it now.
Do you know what Twitter should do? Ditch all URL shorteners and just flag all URLs as 25 characters toward the 140, regardless of length. Problem solved.
Sorry and good luck,
Richard
The fact is tr.im is a small time service that currently has no chance of making any decent return on the amount of time it takes to keep it running. It is a bad spot. Not growing fast enough to reach any way to make more than $500 a month in revenue, but growing fast enough that it required a lot of work to take it further.
Harpy, very happy! Thanks you for the decision, thanks!
Good luck for after, - Christophe.
I am more than willing to assist tr.im by way of recommendations, e.g. tweet out
Maybe it would be beneficial to have a formatted text message to tweet
Best of luck
Michele Smorgon (@maxOz)
I'm sure many of us would gladly pay a few dollars a month for a premium service (I would). Also, by recycling the URLs created by free members you could keep tr.im URLs even shorter compared to your competition.
are really willing to pay for that?
It appears that there were several requests to buy your service (me included) but that you changed your mind on wanting to sell it - for moral reasons it appears
You would have rather shut the service down, then sell it to someone that could make money from it.
It could have been a win/win but now the service will reach a second brickwall when you complain later that you can't afford the bandwidth and development costs.
Let us know when the stunt is over, you get over your moral conundrum and want to really sell the site and make some money.
I'll start the bidding at $1